With a specialist dermatologist , laser hair removal can be performed on virtually all areas of the body. The laser technique allows the dermatologist to destroy the bulb and the hair shaft by targeting its melanin. Laser hair removal is particularly effective on thick, dark hair.
Reimbursements are possible to cover skin care. Under certain conditions (mentioned below), this support may even be total.
Reimbursement of laser hair removal by Health Insurance
Yes, health insurance can cover laser hair removal . When a laser dermatologist is contracted, he is recognized by health insurance. By respecting the coordinated care pathway, it is up to the attending physician to send his patient to see this specialist with a prescription. These conditions will ensure that the patient will be reimbursed for the consultation and the procedure up to 70% .
Exception for laser hair removal outside the treatment path
- Dermatologist laser hair removal on ALD patient (long-term condition)
- Follow-up consultation
- Emergency related to laser hair removal
Reimbursement of laser hair removal by the mutual insurance company
Yes, a good health insurance can pay for laser hair removal . The reimbursement of complementary health insurance is indeed possible up to 30%, in particular for laser hair removal covered by health insurance, if the patient has followed the course of care.
To find a mutual insurance company capable of paying for the reimbursement of laser hair removal, MutuelleSante.fr provides you with a mutual insurance company that can provide you with several quotes. The best guarantee-price ratio will help you make the best choice of mutual health insurance.
“Definitive” hair removal: medical or aesthetic gesture?
Is permanent laser hair removal a medical gesture? If so, only the best skin clinic in south delhi should be able to perform it, not estheticians. This is the debate that several unions of health professionals relaunched on January 19, 2016 at the Paris Criminal Court, citing signs and franchises of aesthetics for “illegal practice of medicine” .
Strictly supervised hair removal practice
In France, the practice of hair removal is governed by a 1962 decree which provides that “any method of hair removal is a medical act, except hair removal with tweezers or wax” . However, for several years, a number of beauty centers have developed an offer of pulsed light hair removal, a method known to slow down hair regrowth in the medium or even long term. Less effective than the laser which aims to destroy the base of the hair follicle to prevent hair regrowth, the pulsed light technique is content to damage the follicles to slow down the reappearance of the hair. Thus, this technique offers hair removal that should be qualified as “lasting” rather than “permanent”.
However, the pulsed light technique also uses heat to damage structures in the dermis; and therefore presents just as much a risk of burns. Hair removal must indeed allow a sufficiently deep thermo-coagulation so that two thirds of the hair follicles are destroyed so as to prevent any implantation of new hairs.
Health problem or economic issues?
What will we do “when we have a burnt eye or penis?” , asked, during the hearing, Me Alexandre Varaut, representative of doctors’ unions and the SARL Doctor Debray. “It is illegal to practice hair removal by pulsed light when you are not a doctor” , defended this lawyer also implicating the franchisors of aesthetics: “To provide the means to commit an offense, it is to surrender guilty. “
For one of the defense lawyers, Me David Simhon, this is a question of financial monopoly rather than a real health problem: “It is a political trial initiated by a doctor, president of a medical union, against others who are presidents of unions in aesthetics. Doctors do not practice hair removal with pulsed light but with lasers, the defense pleaded. The commercial company that summoned us all to appear makes a Turnover of more than 3 million euros. It is not a question of defending public health but an economic interest, even a monopoly “ , he insisted. Me David Simhon announced to want to attack in turn the civil party for “abuse of summons to appear”and claimed an acquittal, as well as € 30,000 per civil party for each of its clients for the damage suffered. The prosecutor relied on the opinion of the court, which delivered its deliberation on March 15, 2016.
Permanent hair removal: estheticians can do it!
It is the end of a monopoly. Pulsed light hair removal (IPL) could very soon be offered in beauty salons. Until now, only dermatologists had the right to practice it, but a decree could soon change the situation, report Les Échos. Enough to provoke the anger of the National Union of Dermatologists-Venereologists (SNDV) who highlight the risks of hair removal with pulsed light if the device is not handled correctly, reports UFC-Que-Choisir.
A thorough examination of the skin must be carried out beforehand, and throughout the treatment, which only a dermatologist is able to perform. “If a doctor sees a melanoma-like lesion, he will not pass the device over it,” explains Dr Anne Bellut, dermatologist and secretary general of the SNDV board of directors. According to the union, estheticians do not have the necessary training to spot this type of lesion. “There is a risk of burning serious lesions, such as melanoma, and of altering their appearance. The lesion can then be masked, and therefore continue to develop”, continues Dr. Anne Bellut, cited by UFC-Que- To choose.
The Consumer Safety Commission (CSC) and the National Health Security Agency (ANSES) both looked into the dangerousness of IPL. And if some side effects, such as inflammation or other minor burns, have been noticed, the danger remains less. “We found very few incidents related to hair removal with pulsed light or laser. If specific training is in place, it should specify when to refer the client to the dermatologist”, explains Professor Gérard. Lorette, dermatologist at the CHU de Tours, who headed the ANSES working group.
As Les Echos reminds us, it’s a five-year battle that could end with this decree. In 2017, ANSES had already recommended reviewing the regulations. In November 2018, the estheticians finally obtained a favorable arbitration from Matignon. The decree of January 6, 1962 indicated that only medical doctors could perform these acts.